Upcoming Holiday Events in Winchendon!
December 5: Festival of Lights Tree Lighting at Grout Park
December 6: Festival of Lights with Santa at Old Murdock Senior Center
December 7: Vendor Sale at the American Legion
December 13: Holiday Bazaar and Cookie Sale at UUCW
December 13: Sensory Friendly Santa Visit at Beals Memorial Library
December 13--December 14: Christmas in Toy Town Holiday Open House at WHCC
December 14: A Christmas Carol presented by The Bridge Artistic Network at
____________Cornerstone Church
December 14: A Classic Christmas - Concert with Cassie Swartz at the WHCC
December 17: Movie Night at the Beals, It's a Wonderful Life
December 18: Winchendon Community Caroling at the Beals
December 20: Pioneer Valley Brass Quintet at UUCW
For details, scroll down to the Community Connector Calendar!
This Week's Winchendon News
Voters Reject Funding Fire Station Project at Special Town Meeting

Photo by Inanna Arthen

Photo by Inanna Arthen
At a Special Town Meeting convened on Monday, December 1, 243 Winchendon voters rejected both articles on the warrant after an hour of debate. A proposal for the town to collect a lodging excise tax from short-term rentals such as AirBnBs, motels, and hotels, which would have netted the town an estimated $30,000 or so in annual revenue, failed to pass. Article 2, which asked voters to approve borrowing $16.6 million to fund the Fire Station Renovation and Addition Project, required a two-thirds majority to pass, because it involved borrowing. The vote on Article 2 came in as a perfect tie, 50 percent in favor and 50 percent opposed. As this fell short of the required two thirds, the article failed.
The Special Town Meeting marked the first Town Meeting presided over by Town Moderator Glenn LaRochelle, who was elected in May and assumed his formal duties after the 2025 Annual Town Meeting. Attorney Tim Zessin from KP Law was present serving as Town Counsel. Voters heeded the advice to arrive early for check-in, so Mr. LaRochelle was able to call the meeting to order promptly at 7:00 p.m. After the Pledge of Allegiance was spoken, Article 1 was brought to the floor.
Article 1 asked voters "to accept the provisions of Massachusetts General law, Chapter 6014 section 3A, authorizing the imposition of a local excess tax upon the transfer of occupancy of any room or rooms in a bed and breakfast establishment, hotel, lodging house, short term rental or hotel in town
at a rate of 6 percent of the total amount of rent for each such occupancy, to take effect on the first day of July 2026."
Voter Mary Ellen Lewandowsky rose to ask how much revenue the town was expecting to generate.
Town Manager Bill McKinney responded, "I contacted Department of Revenue about this, and they said we could expect about $30,000 per year."
Board of Selectmen member Audrey LaBrie said that "with the understanding that this is something that had not been implemented in the town before," the Board felt that with the town's financial situation, they needed to consider every opportunity to bring in additional revenue. However, she said, "I recognize, I'm speaking for myself, that on top of the state tax that is already in existence, this is a bit of a bind. So I move to amend the motion to a 3 percent tax."
The amendment was then seconded and on the floor. A voter rose to ask where in town the bed-and-breakfast worth $30K in taxes was, "seems like a total waste of time."
Mr. McKinney explained, "Much like the meals tax and cannabis excise tax, the state actually collects all the funds, and then if the town implements that additional tax, reverts back to us, so the town doesn't do any extra work for this. So anyone who's registered with the state as a lodging establishment is already collecting state taxes and turning them over to the state. So this would be an additional tax that would again be turned over to the state and then remitted back to the town." While a cogent explanation of the article, the voter said that it didn't answer his question.
The vote on the amendment was called, and the amendment failed with 43 percent in favor, 57 percent opposed.
With the original article back on the floor, a non-resident, Ashley, came forward, explaining that she is the manager of one of the Winchendon properties subject to the tax, and was speaking on behalf of her brother who owns the property. She explained that AirBnB takes an 18.8 percent cut, the state of Massachusetts takes 9 percent, and then they pay a mortgage and property taxes. The property, on Lake Monomonac, brings people into town who eat at the local restaurants and buy fishing supplies at the tackle shop, and go home and recommend local businesses to their friends. Another 6 percent tax could mean they would have to shut down their short-term rental.
Voter Tina Santos rose to ask if the 6 percent being proposed involved raising the state's 5.7 percent tax to 6 percent or was an additional 6 percent on top of the state's 5.7 percent. Mr. McKinney said it was additional.
Voter Coral May Grout rose to ask how many businesses would be impacted by the tax, and "are we pushing something on the backs of people who already have a lot on their backs?" Mr. McKinney said he didn't have a breakdown of the number of properties and how much each one would pay, but he guessed it was around 15 to 20. They would all have to be registered with the state.
Voter Rick McComsey rose to say, "My concern would be, I know some of these short term rentals are for some local citizens who become displaced, and so we are going to include an additional financial burden upon them, which is totally unnecessary, for only $15,000 a year. I just don't think that's right."
Voter Marc from Mellen Road rose to say that he didn't think voters understood the amendment that had been voted on and asked for the vote to be repeated. Voters disagreed from the floor and Marc withdrew his proposal.
The vote was then called for Article 1 and it failed, with 44 percent in favor, 56 percent opposed.
Article 2 was then brought to the floor. It asked voters "to raise and appropriate, transfer from available funds, and/or borrow the sum of Sixteen Million Six Hundred Thirty-Two Thousand Four Hundred Ninety-Nine Dollars ($16,632,499) for the purpose of constructing, equipping and furnishing a Fire Station Addition and Renovation project, including all costs incidental and related thereto; provided, however, that if the Town votes hereunder to borrow funds for this purpose, such vote shall be contingent upon approval by the voters at an election that the amounts required to repay the debt and interest on such borrowing shall be excluded from the limitations on the tax levy imposed by Proposition 2-1/2, so called, pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 59, Section 21C(k)."
With Article 2 on the floor, the first voter to come forward was Rick Lucier, who made a "subsidiary motion, S14, to postpone Article 2 until the Annual Town Meeting on May 4, 2026, in order for the residents of the town of Winchendon to assess their tax obligations after they receive their January tax bills." The motion was seconded.
This motion created some confusion for voters who were prepared to speak to the original article and now weren't sure when they could present their statements. Voter Joseph Lillie came forward to say, "People of Winchendon, I just want to plead with you for a moment and just say whatever happens today or later, I can understand both sides of this story. If it does happen to go through, we need to be there for each other. And if it does not go through, if there's any firefighters here, just know that we are not ready yet." Ms. Santos rose to ask about the Board recommendations on the article, but had to wait for the discussion and voting on the motion to be finished.
Voter Brian Croteau came forward to say, "One thing to consider when you push this into the spring, because we're looking at a $16.6 million price tag that's going to go up by a half a million to a million dollars in that six months. So everybody's willing to pay more later, that's what's going to
happen."
A voter rose to ask about the impact the article had on tax bills. Mr. Lucier came forward to clarify his motion. "The reason I mentioned to have a postponement so people can assess their tax bills," he explained. "Nobody has seen the January tax bills. You can do an estimation based on a calculation that the town gives you, but that may not encompass everything that comes and your assessed value is going to change along with your taxes. So when you get to go for that
override, it could be quite a bit more than what they are projecting. Based on that, I'm just giving people more time with the article that I'm not going to speak to. I'm on Social Security. I don't even know what I'm going to get for an increase from Social Security. If I'm lucky, it might be 1 percent, it's been running less than 3 percent for, I don't know how many years, so I'm not going to be able to cover it, myself and my wife, and I'm not alone in this. There are a lot of other people that are in this, so I feel that we should postpone it for now. Figure out if it can be pared down and everything else, doesn't mean it's going to cost more in the spring, they may come to their senses and tune it down somewhat, if it's not a $16 million fire station."
Voter Diane Cloutier rose to say, "I just want to talk to you about something bigger than just a building, bigger than just the one line item, bigger than just any simple vote. I want to talk to you about who we are as a town and who we want to become. For decades, we historically carried one of the lowest property tax rates in the region. It brought people here, made us feel thrifty and disciplined, but there's a point when being thrifty becomes being shortsighted and makes it impossible to sustain the town. I think we've hit that point. Our infrastructure is falling apart because we have not invested in it, and now our fire station is outdated, overcrowded and unsafe. This is not an opinion. This has been supported by feasibility studies and official findings...Our schools are losing students through school choice, and we, as a town, we're losing $5,000 to $10,000 for every child that leaves, and with a fire station that's outdated and overcrowded and it's not fair to the men and women who risk their lives for us every day. Our town is struggling to attract new businesses because no company wants to move into a community that's not even maintaining the basics. New business is what brings more taxes into town, and therefore brings our taxes down. If you need proof look at many towns like Bellingham and Franklin, they've got different tax rates. The corporations pay $19.43."
After clarifying that the original article needed to pass by a two-thirds majority and then followed up with a ballot vote, a vote was called on Mr. Lucier's motion to postpone. The motion to postpone failed, with 47 percent in favor, 53 percent opposed.
The original article was now back on the floor.
Voter Joe Sackett rose to say, "We had the opportunity to tour the fire station with Chief Smith last Saturday, and we heard his compelling case for our town's fire station needs. He took us to every room and described how unsafe it was for our firefighters and paramedics. With no garage ventilation, the living quarters had a permanent smell of diesel. The kitchen has the only deep sink, and must therefore be used both for washing contaminated gear, along with preparing food and drink. Those returning from fires covered in soot and chemicals had to walk through this small shared dormitory to get to the single shower to decontaminate. But to me, most striking was the turnout area. This is where the firefighters got their gear before getting into one of the trucks to head out. The turnout area is a rack that's jammed behind a ladder truck with a three foot space for our firefighters to put their gear on. Chief Smith didn't even have to point out the
potential to slow the emergency response caused by this single design flaw.
"Unfortunately, there's many such deficiencies which could endanger both our lives and property, as well as those of the firefighters. I do not know how the fire and EMS staff made do for so long with a wholly inadequate station. My wife Jill and I understand finances and building renovation cost efficiency. We understand how this renovation will pay for itself over time. The plan is minimalist. By the way, there's no gym, that was removed, as far as I understand. And the plan is sound. So if you came here intending to vote no, I can tell you to reconsider. A lot of us do. The property taxes, I understand. They take away value that we have for other needs. But however adequate this fire station was in 1975, after 50 years of heavy use, it is outgrown and unsafe. Our protectors need the renovations, basic life safety improvements, and we deserve the improved protection services that this will provide."
Board of Selectmen member Erika Eitland said that if voters went to the Fire Department website, winchendonfire.org, they would find a FAQ under Community Documents explaining the whole project in detail. (It's at https://winchendonfire.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Color-FAQ-Handout.pdf)
Voter Russ St. Pierre rose to say, "I work for a community that wasted $18 million on a police station, and I can't see why we want to waste $16 million on a fire station. We have a lot of elderly people in our community that are struggling to pay their bills. Food costs are high. Homeowners insurance have gone up 40 percent because of wildfires and hurricanes across the country, and they expect us to pay more for a fire station which the town chose not to maintain for a number of years. You can come up with a smaller number, put a separate outbuilding in to put in showers or a locker room or something to store your trucks in. You don't need a $16 million station...It's a chronic problem between federal, state and local communities that we don't maintain our buildings. That's not our call as taxpayers. We pay our bills. You come up with a number that we can support, we'll support it."
Voter Darlene Rossi rose to ask how the estimated increase in taxes on a hypothetical $350,000 home
was calculated and how many years the increase would be in place. Winchendon Fire Chief Tom Smith rose to explain that they expected to bond the project for 30 years unless they found a better deal available at the time of borrowing. Combining the project cost and debt service (interest) on the loan, they derived the estimated increase of $5.19 per week on an "average" Winchendon home.
Mr. Croteau came forward to say that the project has already been scaled down to the "bare minimum" and if it went down any more, it wouldn't be worth doing.
Ms. Santos came forward to reiterate her question about the Board recommendations--or in the case of the Capital Planning Committee, the vote not to recommend--as well as to point out that this project has been pushed aside for years, and during COVID, the fire station was one of the few public buildings in town that remained open. In response to her question, Mike Barbaro, member of the Capital Planning Committee, said that the committee voted 3-2 not to recommend, "not that we don't need a new fire station, because we believed we did. We just don't believe in this project."
Voter Ricci Ruschioni rose to speak at length, saying he had worked for the Fire Department for 39 years and was their longest-standing crew member. He described doing rescues using the department's dive truck which currently does not have garage space at the station in the winter. In 2018 he was diagnosed with job-related leukemia because of contaminants he was exposed to on the job. He's 66, he said, and his only retirement is the fire department pension because he doesn't qualify for Social Security. The station was built in 1977, Mr. Ruschioni said, and in the past the department tried to add a one-bay extension to the building, and failed. "It's inevitable that this is going to happen," he said. "You will get a new station, whether it's going to be an addition, whether it will be a big station or small space."
Ms. Eitland said that although she was not present when the Board of Selectmen voted to recommend, she would have voted yes. "We have already spent money on this project, and we spent close to $800,000 on this project," she said. "So if you are willing to throw away that $800,000 that is something that will be lost...we cut down this building in terms of square footage and services. The truth of the matter is, is this building is 11,000 square feet less than what we had originally spent, and it is costing more because of inflation." The working conditions for the crew are "unacceptable," she said. The new building is being designed to reduce operating costs through energy efficiency and durability. The town has stood by its departments, it's supported its library and Senior Center. "This is an important time to invest in another department that literally is saving lives, and we know that in this town with old infrastructure, we've had multiple fires that have displaced people, and that requires us to have the fire department that shows up, and especially in a population where we know there are older residents that live with us, and therefore that response of the ambulance. We can't afford to wait 20 minutes if there's somebody right down the road who could be there to help us." There is also the question of hiring and retaining qualified employees, who won't want to work in a building that is in poor repair and endangering their health.
After Ms. Eitland spoke, there were yells from the floor to call the vote, but voter Ken Wante was recogized by Mr. LaRochelle. Mr. Wante asked people who had ever called 911 to raise their hands. About a dozen or so people did. "Not too many," Mr. Wante said, "but I guarantee you will at some point in your life, whether it's your mom or your dad having a heart attack, your kid in a car accident, or someone having a fire in a trash can, and all of a sudden a barn goes up, you're gonna dial 911. Wouldn't you want the best possible care and personnel to show up at your house when you're in this state of emergency? We're talking about $250 a year to upgrade the fire station, provide these people with the best possible equipment and opportunity to save your property and your lives. My sons are in the fire department. I don't want them to get cancer. You heard people come up and talk about that today, it's about time we upgraded the fire station and provide everybody in this town with the best possible care and provide the employees of the fire department with the best possible fire station and equipment."
In response to a question about how much grant and other funding the department hoped to get, Chief Smith named a number of sources, including funding for a portion of the diesel exhaust system for about $75,000, rebates from National Grid, Green Communities grants for the building, USDA loans and grants, and AFG grants through the federal government. "There are a number of different avenues that we're looking for to try to reduce the cost," he said. "Ultimately, once the project is built and the entire $16.6 million doesn't need to be spent, if it's not spent, it's not needed, it's not borrowed. So you can have reduction off of that, as well as reduction off of the insurances that are going to have to be added to the town's protection. So that $16.6 should be the max of everything, every other thing would be reducing off of that, which would then also reduce the tax impact."
Marc came forward to argue that people in town with private wells helped pay for the water system used by people on town water. 40 percent of the town doesn't have access to a fire hydrant, and the fire department needs to bring water in trucks to respond to fire in those neighborhoods. "This is not the government. This is the firemen, like what part of the government is good? The first thing you say is the firemen," he said.
After one more voter asked again about grants and funds available or potentially available, to offset the borrowed amount (the answers were, as before, unknown for sure) the vote was called. The vote on Article 2 was an even tie, 50 percent in favor and 50 percent opposed. Since a two thirds vote was required, the article failed.
Mr. LaRochelle called for an adjournment, at 8:04 p.m.
The recording of the Town Meeting in its entirety may be viewed on WinchendonTV at https://winchendon.cablecast.tv/CablecastPublicSite/show/330?site=1.
A Quick Informational Note on Lodging Places in Winchendon
According to the Public Registry of Lodging Operators on the Mass.gov website (https://www.mass.gov/info-details/public-registry-of-lodging-operators), there are 17 registered lodging operators in the town of Winchendon: one hotel, one Bed and Breakfast, and 15 "Short Term Rentals". Most of the short-term rentals are properties on Lake Monomonac. The Registry does not give full addresses, only street names. But the streets are:
2nd Street (1)
4th Street (2)
Academy Street (1)
Beachview Drive (1)
Front Street (1, bed and breakfast)
Glenallen Street (5)
High Street (1)
Hilltop Terrace (1)
Island Road (1)
Lakeview Drive (2)
Spring Street (1, hotel)
Not all short term rentals are AirBnBs. But AirBnB lists 13 properties in Winchendon, with their listed fee for a 5-night stay. These range from $452 for an "apartment" all the way up to $5,876 (or $1,175 per night) for a home on the water. The median listing fee is $1,405 for a five-night stay (or $281 per night).
For comparison, as of right now, prices for a room at the Colonial Hotel in Gardner are advertised at $130 per night, at the King Phillip Motel, $129 per night, at Great Wolf Lodge, $173 per night, and the Benjamin Prescott Inn in Jaffrey is listed at $225 per night.
Local High School Students are Encouraged to Apply for North Central Massachusetts Chamber Foundation Scholarship Program
North Central, Mass. (December 2, 2025) - The North Central Massachusetts Chamber Foundation is excited to announce that applications for the 2026 Scholarship Program are now being accepted from local high school students in North Central Massachusetts.
Each year, the Chamber Foundation awards approximately 25 college scholarships to support students continuing their education, made possible by contributions from members of the North Central Massachusetts Chamber of Commerce. In 2025 the Foundation also introduced a new non-traditional scholarship specifically for students pursuing trade programs or vocational training, expanding opportunities for diverse career pathways.
Students interested in applying for a scholarship in 2026 should reach out to their high school guidance department. Each school in the Chamber's service area can submit a limited number of scholarship applicants each year. These applications will be reviewed by a committee of Chamber members. The deadline to apply is Saturday, February 28, 2026.
Since establishing its scholarship program, the North Central Massachusetts Chamber Foundation has awarded over one million dollars in scholarships. Many of these awards are made possible through contributions from Chamber members. Scholarships offered through the Chamber Foundation are often named in honor of prominent members of the North Central Massachusetts business community, whose philanthropy and commitment have significantly shaped the region, or companies that have sponsored a scholarship.
The Chamber Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization focused on improving the area through charitable activities. Funds raised by the Foundation are primarily used for education and workforce development initiatives, as well as charitable activities in North Central Massachusetts. This includes scholarships for eligible applicants pursuing education and grants to support economic and community development projects.
Donations to support the Chamber Foundation's scholarship program are greatly appreciated. Contributions can be mailed to the North Central Massachusetts Chamber Foundation at 860 South St., Fitchburg, MA 01420, or made securely online at www.northcentralmass.com/donate.
For those interested in sponsoring or endowing a named scholarship in honor of a prominent business or community leader, please contact Teresa Roberts, Director of Finance, or Roy Nascimento, President, at 978.353.7600 ext. 227 or 225.
For more information on the North Central Massachusetts Chamber Foundation's scholarship program or to view a list of the named scholarships, please visit northcentralmass.com or call 978.353.7600 ext. 222.
Sen. Jo Comerford Holding Virtual Town Hall on December 10
Senator Comerford will be hosting an opportunity for constituents to engage with her and her team on Wednesday, December 10. "The People's Town Hall" will be held on Zoom from 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. Senator Comerford and her team will offer timely updates, and there will be ample time to hear constituent feedback and answer questions.
Registration is required for this free event. To register, go to https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/-QuwkNkCQuSiW-VB5EbqKQ#/registration.
English live transcription (subtitles) and translated captions will be enabled for this Town Hall. Zoom translated captions enable users to have the speech in the Town Hall automatically translated in real-time to captions in another language. Participants will be able to self-enable captions and switch languages without the need of the host. Zoom offers translated captions in Chinese (Traditional and Simplified), French, Spanish, Vietnamese, and more.
The transcript will be posted on the Senator's website after the event.
The Town Hall will be recorded and shared online for those who are unable to attend live.
If you have any questions about the Town Hall or accessibility concerns, please contact Director of Communications and Engagement Katelyn Billings at katelyn.billings@masenate.gov.



