This Week's Winchendon News
Citizens Have Questions About Underride Petition Question Not Included on Town Election Ballot

Terry Logue addresses the BOS
Photo copyright Town of Winchendon
During the public comment period of the Board of Selectmen's meeting on Monday, April 13, several citizens came forward to express disappointment that a citizen petition question was not placed on the ballot for the upcoming Town Election. A group of citizens had collected signatures on a petition to place a question before voters for a proposed Proposition 2-1/2 underride of $1.4 million.
Citizen Yvonne Senecal came forward to say, "Over the past four months, there has been a grassroots movement to address the excessive and punitive property tax increases through a tax underride. This earnest effort has had overwhelming community support. Winchendon functions under a town home rule charter. Town Meeting is the legislative branch and votes on appropriations, bylaws and policies. The Board of Selectmen does not hold primary legislative power. At our Annual Town Meeting, we review, amend and adopt the budget. This includes setting tax rates and decisions occur through majority vote.
"After discussion, residents organized, gathered signatures, submitted that petition and had that petition certified. They believed they were participating in good faith in the democratic process. Our Board of Selectmen chose not to put the citizen underride petition on the ballot. This leaves many questions unanswered. Was this presented to the Board of Selectmen for a vote when the debt exclusion for the schools was presented? Why weren't voters given the opportunity to decide? Residents followed the process available to them. The petition was submitted and certified. The final step, the one that actually puts it in front of the voters, was entirely in the hands of leadership, and they chose not to bring it forward. This is not about process anymore. This is about transparency. This is about trust in your local government. The voters are paying attention, and you will be held accountable."
Following Ms. Senecal, citizen Barbara Zisk came forward to say, "I stand before you tonight because what happened here was bigger than taxes, bigger than an underride and bigger than any one board. It was about the rights of the taxpayers and voters of this town. For months, residents organized. They signed the petitions. They had conversations, they followed the process they believed was available to them. They spoke up because they are struggling, because they are concerned and because they wanted their voices heard. But instead of allowing the people to decide at the ballot box, the opportunity was taken away. Let that sink in, not defeated by voters, not rejected in an election, not decided by the people, stopped before the people ever had a say.
"And what makes this even more troubling is that we have heard a very different standard before, most recently during discussion of the Fire Station project, when a resident asked for it to be delayed, the response was that the voters have the right to decide. I agree with that statement. The voters do have the right to decide. But apparently that only applies when leadership agrees with the questions being asked. If it is something favored and supported, voters should decide if it is something inconvenient or unwanted. Voters are denied the chance that's that is not consistency, that is not fairness, and that is not leadership that should concern every resident in this town, whether they supported the underride or opposed it, because when government decides which questions voters are allowed to vote on and which ones they are not, we all lose. Today it was the underride. Tomorrow, it could be another issue that matters deeply to residents."
Citizen David Watkins came forward to say, "What are you folks afraid of with this underride vote? There's obvious fear here. Otherwise you would not be opposing it. I believe we have the right to vote in this town." He stated that the Town Manager could not refuse to put an article on the warrant (the petition was to place a question on the Town Election ballot), told Town Manager Bill McKinney that he would be calling him, and demanded to know what Board Chair Andrew Beauvais' name was.
Citizen Terry Logue came forward to say, "We took a pledge before this meeting ever started, the last sentence being 'with liberty and justice for all.' You need to take account of the people who are here and what they are trying to say. The warrant is justified, and you take a good hard look, all of you, before you make a determination as to whether or not to allow it to set on the ballot."
Citizen Rick Lucier came forward to say, "I just wanted to comment that I think it's a little hypocritical for this Board or any other Board in the town of Winchendon to circumvent anything that the people of this town bring forward, to have put on a ballot without, as they say, sometimes, their due process. This should be out there. It should be listened to and all these Board members, you've taken an oath to upstand and do the work of the people, but when circumvention comes in and hypocrisy comes in, you've lost all credibility."
Board of Selectmen member Audrey LaBrie asked if the Board could have some clarification about "how the ballots are put together" as opposed to articles in the Town Meeting warrant which are often added by citizen petition. "The ballot is something that the Board of Selectmen has no input on, to the best of my knowledge, as far as the names that go on it, the questions that go on it," she said. "I know that we review the warrant, but I'd like to find out what that process is, just for general information, if nothing else."
Town Manager Bill McKinney said, "There are generally three types of override/underride questions. There is a general override and there's a debt exclusion. Those questions can only be put on a town wide ballot by the Board of Selectmen. An underride can be put on the ballot by the Board of Selectmen or by a citizens' petition if it's allowed anywhere in the charter. There's nowhere in the Town Charter that allows for that...because there's no provision in the Charter, the only way [a ballot question] can get on is through a vote of the Board of Selectmen."
There was further discussion about the general topic of how questions are placed before voters either as warrant articles or as ballot questions. The warrant for Annual Town Meeting has not yet closed--it will close on April 21, and the Board of Selectmen will review and vote on the final warrant at their meeting on Monday, April 27.
Ms. LaBrie asked if the underride question petition itself could be reviewed by the Board so they could see how it was worded and make sure it was handled correctly.
Mr. McKinney mentioned a document on the MA Department of Revenue website that explains all the protocols for Proposition 2-1/2 votes in great detail. It is "Proposition 2½ Ballot Questions: Requirements and Procedures (August 2017)" by the MA Department of Revenue Division of Local Services, found at
https://www.mass.gov/doc/proposition-2-12-ballot-question-requirement-and-procedure/download (PDF). On pages 2-3, it says:
III. ELECTION PROCEDUREThe underride proponents have a Facebook page with more information at https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61588636842731.
A. PLACING QUESTIONS BEFORE VOTERS
Proposition 2½ questions are placed on an election ballot by vote of the "local appropriating body," which is defined in towns as the selectboard, not town meeting. In towns without selectboards, a vote of the town council is required to present a question to the electorate. In cities, a vote of the city council, with the mayor's approval where required by law, is needed. G.L. c. 59, § 21C(a).
This is the only way an override or exclusion question may be placed on the ballot. They may not be placed on the ballot by a town meeting vote or any local initiative procedure authorized by law. A local initiative procedure, however, may be used as an alternative method of placing an underride question on the ballot.
The board or council must vote the question exactly as it will appear on the ballot.
1. Overrides and Underrides
A majority vote of the board or council is needed to place an override or underride question on the ballot. G.L. c. 59, § 21C(g) and (h)
2. Exclusions
A 2/3 vote of the board or council is needed to place an exclusion question on the ballot. G.L. c. 59, § 21C(i½), (j) and (k).
B. ELECTION PROCEDURE
Proposition 2½ questions may be placed on a regular or special municipal election ballot. Questions may also be placed on the state biennial election ballot. However, those questions must be submitted to the Secretary of State for certification by the first Wednesday in August preceding the election. G.L. c. 59, § 21C(i).
The usual laws and procedures relating to municipal elections apply. The municipal clerk must receive written notice of the question being placed on the ballot at least 35 days before the date of the election. G.L. c. 54, § 42C. The vote to place a question on the ballot must take place in sufficient time to meet this advance notice requirement.
A city or town may present Proposition 2½ questions to the voters as many times during the year as it chooses. The only constraint on the interval between these elections is the time needed to call and hold each election.
The Office of the Secretary of State is responsible for administering and enforcing election laws. Specific questions about the application of these laws to Proposition 2½ elections should be directed to the Elections Division of that office at 617-727-2828.
Koi Asian Cuisine Holds Grand Opening Ceremonies with Official Ribbon Cutting
Although it began welcoming customers several weeks ago in what was called a "soft opening," Koi Asian Cuisine held its official ribbon cutting and celebration on Saturday morning, April 11. Rebecca Marois of the Greater Gardner Chamber of Commerce invited local officials and members of the press to the event, which was mostly held outside, and the actual ribbon cutting was the least of it.
Restaurant staff and family members prepared for hours for the ceremonies, which included an array of Asian banquet foods such as a whole suckling pig, whole roasted fowl, whole fish, dumplings, rice and other delicacies worthy of an Emperor's table. The food was surrounded with burning joss sticks of incense, and prayers were quietly spoken. The ribbon cutting was followed by a 30-minute performance by the elaborately costumed and highly skilled Lion Dancers, who had traveled from the Wah Lum Kung Fu & Tai Chi Academy in Malden. The dancers wove around the entire crowd outside, giving attendees fruit from the lions' mouths, before processing inside to circle the restaurant interior, all to the constant rhythm of drums, bells and percussion instruments.
You could feel the good luck and positive energy filling the air, not to mention rattling the windows as everything moved into the gleaming, newly refurbished dining rooms. Koi Asian Cuisine was already getting great reviews from local residents. After one of the best Grand Openings Winchendon has ever seen, prosperity and good fortune should shine on them like the sun!
Follow Koi Asian Cuisine on Facebook at www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61574477336255, and see their website at www.koiwinchendon.com/. They are located at 302 Spring Street, and their phone number is 978-616-2015.






Photos by Inanna Arthen
Cummings Road Residents Pack ZBA Meeting with Concerns about Proposed Two-Family Conversion

10 Cummings Road as it appeared in August, 2025
Google Street View
The Zoning Board of Appeals meeting on Wednesday, April 15 was attended by around 20 citizens who wanted to express concern about an application for a Special Permit to modify a home located at 10 Cummings Road into a two-apartment duplex. The property is zoned R80-Rural Residential. Although the public hearing legal notice was incorporated into the agenda for that night's ZBA meeting, it was not posted separately on the town website. The meeting agenda was posted two days earlier, on April 13. Direct abuttors received a notification of the hearing but other nearby neighbors did not, a resident told the Courier.
At 7:05 p.m., the ZBA opened the hearing "to discuss the application for a Special Permit submitted by applicant, Robert Grady, for 10 Cummings Road, also known as Assessors Map 8, parcel 53, Winchendon, MA, 01475. Special Permit request to allow for conversion of a single family dwelling to a two family dwelling per section 300-5.2.A of the Winchendon Zoning Bylaws."
Resident James Roth came forward to speak for Mr. Grady, who was on speakerphone on Mr. Roth's cell phone. The Board stated that Mr. Grady could not speak directly because citizens must be sworn in to speak at a Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. Mr. Roth stated that Mr. Grady wants to "turn it into a two family. It's a one family farmhouse. Currently, he's looking to make a first and second floor. The first floor is already under construction, and then turn the second floor also into another unit." One unit would be occupied by Mr. Grady's son and the other rented to another tenant family. The units would each have separate entrances.
Planning Coordinator Nicole Roberts confirmed that there are no other two-family homes in the neighborhood.
Ms. Roberts then read into the record a letter received by the town on April 13. "Dear Nicole, I am writing to formally express my concerns regarding the proposal to convert 10 Cummings Road from a single family residence into a two family dwelling. As a long time resident of Cummings Road, I deeply value the safety, stability and character of our neighborhood. Families, including my own, have chosen to live here because it is a quiet, close-knit community where children can safely play outdoors and neighbors feel comfortable walking and engaging with one another.
"I understand that property owner Robert Grady has previously operated housing in Winchendon that has been made available to individuals transitioning from incarceration, including those with histories of substance abuse and registered sex offenders. While I recognize the importance of providing housing opportunities for individuals in recovery or re-entry, I have serious concerns about the potential risks that this could pose within a residential neighborhood like ours, especially given the presence of multiple school bus stops located at both ends of Cummings Road and along the street. Although it has been stated that this property would be occupied by families, once zoning approval is granted for a two family dwelling, there may be limited ability to ensure or enforce how the property is ultimately used. This uncertainty raises valid safety concerns for residents, particularly those with young children.
"Our neighborhood has remained a predominantly single family area for many years, contributing to a strong sense of safety and community. Changing the use of this property not only increases density, but also introduces uncertainty regarding future occupancy, which could impact the overall well being and peace of mind of residents. I respectfully ask that the Board carefully consider these concerns when reviewing this proposal and to prioritize the safety and character of the existing neighborhood. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, concerned Cummings Road Resident."
Mr. Roth said, "I think Nicole can speak to this. Bobby has spoken to her. He has told her, he has no intentions of putting anybody up there with a criminal history. He's doing this for two just normal families looking for a nice neighborhood to live in. There'd be no criminals going up there at all."
There was some discussion about the distinction between a multi-unit apartment building and a rooming or boarding house. Mr. Roth said there are two bedrooms on the upper floor and three on the first floor. Each unit would have its own kitchen, bathrooms and entrances. A boarding house has at least six bedrooms. The house itself is large, with 3,092 square feet on slightly more than 2 acres. The house was originally built in 1790, according to town records.
Mr. Roth said, "We have other rental properties here in town. The only people that are being considered criminal is on Walnut Street. These other apartments we have around town are just regular families, and that's what this is going to be." He said that Mr. Grady plans to convert the Goodspeed building, which he owns, into low income apartments.
Several citizens came forward to address the board. One angry citizen said, "This town has enough income from pedophiles. We have no safety net for the kids. We moved out of the town because people like this took over the interior...But this coming out in our neighborhoods is getting out of hand. It needs to stop. You guys have the power to stop it."
Another citizen said, "I also read [Robert Grady's] statement from 2014 when he put one of his houses on Walnut Street, where he proposed that he wasn't going to put too many men in one area. There are over 20 pedophiles in that area right now, sorry, sex offenders, if that's what you want to call them. If we allow him to come into our neighborhood, there is three rooms. There's no guarantee. Not only that, half the time they don't register. So you could have non-registered sex offenders and you don't even know. And then what happens when they do, we get notified, and then we can't sell our property without disclosing it. I will guarantee more than half of this road will probably get up and move. It's very unfortunate. My kids love their home. We've been here for a long time, and it's very unfortunate. We cannot let garbage in."
A citizen who lives adjacent to the property said, "Right now they have sex offenders working over there. I don't know if the neighborhood is aware of it. I recognize two of them off the sheet from the Police Department, so they're there now." He said that the property should be left a single-family, and if Mr. Grady wants to rent it to his family, that's fine.
A citizen whose special needs son accompanied her to the hearing came forward to say that there was no way to control who rented the units once the Special Permit was granted.
A resident of Old Centre, John Harrington, questioned whether the town could trust Mr. Grady to properly screen his tenants.
A citizen who identified himself as a retired police officer came forward to point out that the recidivism rate for sex offenders is very high. "You have to realize that when you put it into a residential area spread out the way it is, there's a lot of to and from paths that you can go through woods to houses. I have four grandchildren across the street. I don't want to see anybody hurt by anything. And if you allow housing like this to go into that type of neighborhood you're asking for problems. You have to be aware of everybody that's spoken prior to me. I know I got here a few minutes late, but with small children in that neighborhood next to that house, there's a big chance of problems happening. I've been on the job for 32 years. I did my time. I'm retired. I live around the corner, and I don't want to see this in that neighborhood. I fear for my grandkids, and I hope you guys vote the right way."
With no further citizens wishing to speak, the Board closed the formal hearing. Board Chair Cindy Carvill asked for a 5-minute recess to check out some information and regulations before they proceeded. When the meeting re-convened, Ms. Carvill said that the Board needed to get some legal advice. Ms. Roberts told the Board that the property is not registered as owned by Mr. Grady, but rather by an entity named My Three Sons Investments LLC which is registered in Lafayette, Colorado. Mr. Grady's exact relationship with them is unclear.
Ms. Carvill said, "I have a bunch of questions that we need to consult with the town, other town boards, the Board of Health, the Conservation Commission, the building inspector, and get some information directly from the owner of record."
Mr. Roth said, "The only thing I do want to say and just to show it's on the record. First of all, Mr. Grady is a large taxpayer, and he's spoken before this board before, so this isn't something new. The other thing is that we can, if we don't get the permit to put two families in, we still will have five bedrooms, and you know, we're not trying to go that way, but we've got to generate some revenue from this property. So we're telling you that we will put two families. We will put two families that are non-criminal in this home."
The Board voted to continue the hearing on 10 Cummings Road to the next ZBA meeting, which will be Wednesday, June 17.
According to public records, the previous owners of 10 Cummings Road, Robert and Cecilia Haigh, deeded the property to My Three Sons Investments LLC, "a Foreign Limited Liability Company with a principal place of business at 2770 Arapahoe Rd., #132-222, Lafayette, Boulder County, Colorado, 80026" for $244,900, on November 1, 2024.
My Three Sons Investments LLC also held at one time, or still holds, the deeds to 228-230 Front Street, 33 Walnut Street, 26 Walnut Street and 21 Walnut Street in Winchendon. 26 Walnut Street and 33 Walnut Street are listed as owned by Robert L. Grady, Trustee of ERG Revocable Trust, according to the Town of Winchendon Assessor's database.
My Three Sons Investments, LLC, was formed in 2013 in Colorado. Its public corporate records only mention a single individual, Paul Martin, as Registered Agent, or in other filings, as Member/Manager.
Springtime English Tea at the Beals a Delicious Hit
Sisters Linda (left) and Sandy (right) Dellasanta Dressed for Teatime
Photo by Jill Sackett
A Full House and Festive Atmosphere
Photo by Jill Sackett
Hats were donned and pinkies extended as over 30 people attended the Beals Library Springtime English Tea at the Beals Memorial Library last Saturday, April 11. The tea was organized by the Friends of the Library to raise money for the numerous programs and projects that the library sponsors.
Many of the attendees dressed for the occasion in skirts and fascinators or hats for the ladies and suits for the gentlemen. The Tuckers arrived "in style" in their 1932 Dodge Brothers Coupe, which attracted a lot of admiration while parked at the front curb. The Friends did a marvelous job of decorating the tables with fresh flowers, printed menus, matching serving pieces and center serving tiers. No one left hungry: in addition to unlimited tea, the lineup featured a trio of chicken salad, egg salad and cucumber and cream cheese finger sandwiches, mini-scones with jam and real clotted cream, and an assortment of home made cookies.
Live Celtic music provided by an excellent quartet created a festive atmosphere. The quartet played fiddles, wooden flutes, and Irish (Uilleann) bagpipes. Unlike the more familiar Scottish bagpipes, Irish bagpipes are blown by bellows pumped under the arm. They produce a quieter sound and are designed for indoor, seated playing.
Friends President Sheila Sbrogna had help from several other members, overseeing all of the preparations and greeting arriving guests. Fundraisers like this are an important part of the Beals Library revenue stream. Including the many programs the Friends support, the library has two major projects in their sights: replacement/enlargement of the 100-year-old toilet-size bathroom on the auditorium level, and build-out of a children's room in the library basement which is currently unfinished and houses their ongoing used book sale.
For more information about the library's busy spring-summer schedule, or the Friends of the Library volunteer organization, visit https://www.bealslibrary.org/.
Kit and Karen Tucker (left and right) and Beth Bernstein (center) Arrived in their 1932 Dodge Brothers Coupe
Photo by Jill Sackett
A Plate of Teatime Delicacies
Photo by Jill Sackett
Winchendon Candidates Set for 2026 Town Election
Candidates have been confirmed for the 2026 Town Election, which will take place on Monday, May 4. The following Winchendon citizens have stepped up to run for seats on elected town boards:
Melissa Blanchard
Barbara Zisk
School Committee (two open seats)
Alissa Campbell
Michael Gaynor
Karen Kast-McBride
Yvonne Senecal
Monique Connor
Board of Health, 2-year term (one open seat)
Barbara Zisk
Board of Health, 1 year term (one open seat)
Paula Whitaker
Housing Authority
Nancy Romanowski

