Town Election - Monday, May 4, 2026
8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m, Old Murdock Senior Center (all precincts), 52 Murdock Ave
Annual Town Meeting - Monday, May 18, 2026
7:00 p.m., Murdock High School, 3 Memorial Dr
This Week's Winchendon News
Candidates Answer Questions and Explain Their Views at Winchendon Candidates' Night Forum

From left, Candidates for School Committee Karen Kast, Alyssa Campbell and Michael Gaynor
Photo copyright Town of Winchendon

From left, candidate for School Committee Yvonne Senecal, Candidate for Board of Selectmen and Board of Health Barbara Zisk, and Candidate for Board of Health Monique Connor
Photo copyright Town of Winchendon
On Tuesday, April 28, Beals Memorial Library sponsored a Candidates' Night forum for the candidates running for town offices in Winchendon's Town Election. All candidates were invited to participate, but some had conflicts or chose not to take part. The forum, which took place in the Winchendon Town Hall 2nd floor auditorum, was livecast and recorded by WinchendonTV and the full video is available to view on WinchendonTV. (https://winchendon.cablecast.tv/internetchannel/show/379?site=1)
The forum was moderated by Paul Hackett of Cornerstone Church and the HEAL Collaborative. Dr. Maureen Ward served as "timekeeper" for the candidates' answers. About 25 residents attended in person as audience members. Mr. Hackett had a prepared list of questions to ask. When all those questions had been answered, audience members were invited to come forward and ask questions, for as long as time allowed.
Participating candidates were: Karen Kast (School Committee), Alyssa Campbell (School Committee), Michael Gaynor (School Committee), Yvonne Senecal (School Committee), Barbara Zisk (Board of Selectmen and Board of Health), and Monique Connor (Board of Health).
The candidates were first invited to introduce themselves and give an opening statement, with Karen Kast beginning.
Ms. Kast said, "I have sat on the Winchendon School Committee for six years now, but prior to that I have overall forty years of experience in education. I started advocating for students at the age of 15 as a student, and throughout the forty years, I have held multiple positions where I have been both a parent on the other side of the table, advocating for both my students and multiple students throughout multiple districts. I am a trained special education advocate and certified through the Federation for Children with Special Needs. I am also a certified trainer for the Federation for Children with Special Needs." The district has made improvements, but there are still more it could make, and she wants to continue her work with the Committee.
Ms. Campbell said, "I am a lifelong resident of Winchendon with a brief little stay away when my husband was in the military and I worked in DC. I have been teaching for about ten years. I subbed here in Winchendon for about five or six years. My children were here in the district, and now I teach high school in Fitchburg. I teach some of the most challenging students in our district, and it's my absolute privilege to teach them every day. And I believe that the students are the priority in any organization, specifically the School Committee, and that is why I'm running."
Mr. Gaynor said, "My education background is I have a bachelor's degree in political science from Boston University, a Master of Public Administration from the University of Pittsburgh, a Master of Business Administration from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst and my master's in education, with a secondary concentration in history, is from the University of Massachusetts, Boston. I've been a teacher now for approximately 18 years. I've taught pretty much every subject and most grade levels--elementary, first and second grade, as well as middle school, sixth, seventh and eighth, and then secondary history, nine through 12. I've taught every subject that you can think of, subjects as diverse as psychology to biology to math, seventh grade math, and then also algebra and geometry at the high school level. I've also taught science. I've also taught social studies and history, world history and US history. So I have a wealth of knowledge when it comes to the different curriculums. Currently, I'm a special education teacher like Alyssa. I also teach in the Fitchburg public schools." He added, "I moved to this town about five years ago, and I really believe that we can do great things in the Winchendon Public Schools, but we need to invest in our schools. I really feel like I have a lot of experience and education that I can bring to the table."
Ms. Senecal said, "I have lived here for forty-plus years. I am a retired registered nurse with a 50 year career in pretty much every phase of healthcare, most of it has acute health care. I'm running for School Committee because I think our kids deserve better. We need to dramatically improve educational outcomes while staying fiercely responsible with taxpayer dollars. I don't see that happening. I see our schools struggling, students struggling, and I see money being frivolously spent, and that really concerns me as a resident and a taxpayer and a parent. I would like to see the dollars stay with the students in the classroom and not go to other things...it's important that our students grow up and be lifelong learners and productive adults."
Ms. Zisk said, "I'm a lifelong resident of Winchendon. I care about our community. I've spent time paying attention, attending meetings, listen to residents and seeing people feel unheard. I want to be a voice for the residents. I've attended many meetings. I make my voice heard. I ask questions. I'm not afraid to ask the hard questions. I like to bring forward more transparency, and work hard to help move Winchendon forward. I am a small business owner. I have family here. What is the future of Winchendon for our children, our grandchildren? That's what I'm focused on...It's about you, the taxpayers, and being transparent, honest and having that open communication."
Ms. Connor said, "I am a lifelong resident, and I was an EMT for the town of Winchendon many years. I also worked at Heywood hospital. I worked at the Winchendon Health Center, so a lot of people I know from there, and I'm just going to continue making sure that the health of our community is at the forefront. There are some things that we want to change, but people also have to understand that there's laws that we have to follow as well."
The next question was addressed to all the candidates, Mr. Hackett said: "What are your top two or three priorities if elected? And how would you balance those priorities with the financial realities currently facing the town and its residents?"
Ms. Campbell answered first, saying, "I think the most important thing is that the money that we are spending on our schools is going to the right place, that it is being being thought fully and carefully distributed, and that we are doing the best for our future and our future students...Everyone feels the financial constraints in their household...Unfortunately, things still need to be paid for, our students still need to get an education. Our buildings still need to be updated. If we own our own homes, we have to do that upkeep ourselves. We don't let our roof go, we don't let our windows go, we have to update them, and that goes to the buildings and the curriculum and all the things that go with the school." Money comes first, after the students and faculty, she said. "If you don't address the buildings and the brand, then you are unsuccessful."
Mr. Gaynor spoke about the financial constraints. "We need to move forward as a community and vote to pass this funding for the MSBA reimbursement, which is 78 percent," he said. Otherwise, the buildings will deteriorate more. "Instead of pressing for an underride and just focusing on cutting taxes, let's invest in our schools." He added, "We need to recruit and retain the most best qualified faculty and staff that we can. We want people to make a career here in Winchendon. We don't want to see so much turnover with our teachers and also with our administrators." Federal funding is being cut, and the community needs to step up and invest in our children, because they're our future leaders.
Ms. Senecal said she believed in consolidating the schools and regionalizing. "Every single dollar must go to the classroom, period, our students, our teachers, are working hard, it's time to give them the support to work smarter." She said that money has been wasted, and her second priority is to "fight over those dollars and cents so that we can spend judiciously and wisely."
Ms. Zisk said, "I'd like to look at lowering taxes and improving finances. We need to start there. I think that needs to be looked at hard and long. Start with responsible budgeting, control and unnecessary spending, planning ahead, looking for efficiencies, pursuing grants, encouraging smart economic development that broadens the tax base. Make sure the ta
xpayers dollars are being used wisely, long term financial stability, not short short term fixes."
Ms. Connor said that with Board of Health, "the finances are at a bare minimum." The only salaried employee is the health agent. On the town side, she said, "I feel a lot more structure should be done with the budget, with the schools. Why are these buildings in disrepair? Why weren't they taken care of?"
Ms. Kast wrapped up, saying, "My first priority is, has been, and always will be, students, period." This is the mandate for school committees is Mass General Law, she stated. "The second priority is to make sure that our budget is always balanced, and that we make sure that we spend every dollar wisely. And I know that it's hard when we look at the amount of money that is spent on the school budget, but what a lot of people don't understand is that we get about 85 percent of our school dollars from the state, and...only $3 million actually comes from the town of Winchendon for our budget in Winchendon Public Schools. All the rest come from the state, federal and grants, so we want to spend that money as wisely as possible."
Mr. Hackett's next question was for Board of Health candidates. "Following the recent fire at the former Alaska Freezer factory, there's a renewed interest in the number of abandoned factories in town, as well as the contaminants which may exist on those properties. How would you approach this issue as a Board of Selectmen or Board of Health member?
Ms. Zisk said, "As for the abandoned buildings, we need to take a hard look and we need to figure out how we can regenerate those buildings. What can we use them for? The fire that had happened, that's a tough subject, because we have buildings that as long as the property owners own them and they're up kept on their taxes, there's not a whole lot that the town can do." She said that the community needs to see what it can do to clean up situations. She wants to work with the boards and the Town Manager on the issue.
Ms. Connor said that this issue was also an issue everywhere else. Buildings "past their prime" need to be looked at. Solutions, even clean-ups, can be very expensive for the town. But resolving the issues would be good for the town financially.
Mr. Hackett's next question was for School Committee candidates. "As you know, school enrollment has declined by more than 450 students over the past several years, from about 1,280 to a little over 1,100 today. How would you address challenges like regionalization, school building consolidation and student overflow, and what do you see as the root causes?
Mike Gaynor began by saying he was open minded and willing to talk about regionalization. However, he said, regionalizing can take away the independence and autonomy of a school district. "We need to look at ways to solve the problems that we're having here internally, and invest in our schools," he said. Consolidation of buildings runs into the issue that there are legal requirements for space in classrooms, especially for Special Education students. It's important for students to feel safe in their classrooms and schools, and not have to worry about the roofs and windows. "I believe that if you truly love a district and believe in that district, you don't school choice your kids, you keep them in your local school district," he said.
Ms. Senecal said there are a lot of reasons families choice out--better education, perceived "negative influences," but an underperforming district is paramount. She is in favor of regionalization, she said, and of consolidating students into Memorial and Murdock. With regionalization, costs such as maintenance and administration are shared. "I think there's benefits that have not been explored," she said.
Ms. Kast said that the regionalization question has been going on for a long time, and enrollment has been declining everywhere since the 1960s. Winchendon is not a "failing" district, she stated--the district's report card on the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) website shows that. A major program is that the district doesn't have the money for art programs or AP programs that help students become D1 prospects.
Ms. Campbell wrapped up, explaining that she school-choiced her children for personal family reasons and not because she had issues with Winchendon. She works full time for another district, and it made sense for them. As far as Winchendon, she said, they could look at building up some of the programs Ms. Kast mentioned, and bringing in more programs for the trades. Not every student who wants to go to Monty Tech can get in. "I don't think there is a magic solution here, and I think regionalization comes with costs that we are looking at that we don't realize, and it's not an easy fix. Also, we lose our identity. The Murdock Devils and the community here is really important."
The next question was also for the School Committee candidates. "You guys have discussed a lot of plans to improve academic achievement and address some learning gaps. So give me some specifics, more details around how you would do that. How would you measure that the approach that you're suggesting is actually working?"
Ms. Senecal began, saying, "If you expect kids to only do the minimum, they're going to do the minimum. And I think it's important to expect high standards, to have high standards for our children, and I think then you get more of what you expect." She sees the state MCAS testing as the best way to measure the students' progress. "I would disagree that we are still in remediation with the state, and we are still an underperformance district," she said, saying that the upper grades are not improving in MCAS scores. "I think that working with the teaching staff and finding out from them what they think works, and letting teachers teach and letting parents parent," is best, she said, and schools should be "parenting" kids.
Ms. Kast sais that the School Committee has limited powers to decide how curriculums are taught and there are laws and regulations affecting how assessments are made, so the question as asked isn't really relevant.
Ms. Campbell said, "I would be a millionaire if I could figure that out." She said that she sets high expectations in her classrooms, but students are different now, they can just sit in class and not do anything they're directed to to--just do nothing. "The students we have in front of us are not the students that these curriculums were made for five and 10 years ago. And we have to address the social, emotional learning of the students, and we have to address the world that the kids are living in right now and the new normal that they live in in order to be able to reach them, because these kids are not buying in. And teachers are exhausted," she said. She didn't know an easy fix except to keep on trying new things.
Mr. Gaynor disagreed with Ms. Senecal, saying that Winchendon schools are not in remediation and are not underperforming in comparison with the entire state. "Our dual enrollment program is number one in the state, where students continue classes at Mount Wachusett Community College and earn college credits while they're in high school," he said, and 5th grade MCAS scores show "significant improvement." He feels that early literacy programs are "vitally important", mentioned several programs by name. He also said that social emotional learning programs are "critically important." He added, "We need to understand how best to support our students in their needs, folks, the most important thing we do is keep our students safe. Without safety, they can't be teaching and learning."
Mr. Hackett asked Ms. Zisk, "Can you explain how what you believe is a difference between the Board of Selectmen' role and the Town Manager's role?" Ms. Zisk's concise reply was, "The Board of Selectmen oversees the town. The Town Manager is in charge of day to day activities."
Mr. Hackett then asked the Board of Health candidates the same question, but for the Board of Health versus the health agent.
Ms. Connor said that the health inspector does the leg work , going out with the building inspector to look at properties, while the Board of Health handles permits for things such as food trucks, buildings, restaurants, tobacco and so on. "Ultimately we will decide whether they get their permit or their Title V so that's kind of the difference between them," she said.
Ms. Zisk spoke at length about personally going out with the health agent on Title V inspections and how the Board and the health agent work "side by side". "I think that's something that has changed within the last year or so, because we really are working together and positively, and I don't feel like it's a fight when I come to a meeting and I really enjoy it, and I really enjoy working with Jim, who is our health agent, and learning about what goes on with the inspections, with the Title V, and I've talked a lot with the building inspector."
Mr. Hackett then asked the School Committee candidates, "Can you give me your understanding between the School Committee's role versus a Superintendent's role?"
Ms. Kast began, saying, "The School Committee's role is to set policy and procedure, to oversee the budget and set the budget, to hire the Superintendent. We actually have final say on hiring of a few other positions. In addition to that, we work with the Superintendent, and...we also oversee the curriculum. We approve each of our school's handbooks, and we actually are responsible for knowing all of the laws and regulations and multiple other things." She added that the Superintendent is responsible for the day-to-day work. She turned policies into procedures. She oversees hiring principals but not teachers. "She sets some of the goals for the schools in general, and comes back to us. She starts the budget process every year and brings it to us as a proposal," Ms Kast concluded.
Ms. Campbell said that Ms. Kast had answered very well, adding, "the most important thing is that both the Superintendent and the School Committee can cohesively work together, that they're both strong in each of their own roles, so that the town can get the best out of both. And then if they're both working at capacity and working together, if the School Committee is working with each other, effectively, and with the Superintendent then things go smoothly."
Mr. Gaynor agreed with the previous answers but added that the School Committee needs to collaborate actively with everyone, and be involved. The Committee should visit the schools, know the faculty and administrators, see the classes in action, understand what the business manager is doing. Committee members should also have skills in things like strategic planning. They are the "governing body" for the schools. They need to choose a Superintendent that will stay with the district and not have a lot of administration turnover.
Ms. Senecal agree with the previous speakers but added that the School Committee and Superintendent shouldn't be too cozy, and shouldn't be unwilling to challenge each other when appropriate. "You're sometimes coming from different places, and sometimes that positional challenge can be very productive," she said.
Mr. Hackett's last prepared question, for all the candidates, was about the upcoming debt exclusion vote for the three MSBA school projects. "I want you to tell me what factors you would consider when you have to evaluate large capital projects, like the school roof replacements, and how would you approach a decision like this that affects the taxpayers as well as things that need to be done in the town?"
Ms. Zisk began, saying, "We want to look at not placing an unnecessary burden on the taxpayers. Large projects require careful planning, accurate cost estimates and transparency from the start. I think that's where we've had a little bit of a problem with some large projects that have gone on in our town, is you've been faced with, you have a project in front of you, you get told it's going to cost this much amount, and then in the end, it goes above and beyond, and that ends up on the backs of the taxpayers. When residents see additional costs, it raises concerns and underscores the need for stronger oversight."
Ms. Connor agreed, but said, "unfortunately, every town is going to have--it's just like your home, so you don't have the money, you don't do the project you want to do, or you find another way to do it." She added, "we need to prioritize, and we also need to think of the future" and when something like a Proposition 2-1/2 override comes up, the townspeople need to be making the decision together.
Ms. Kast emphasized that the school roofs were at or beyond their normal forecast lifespan, so it wasn't a question of their not having been maintained. "They were well-maintained," she said. She went on, "When we are looking at any kind of maintenance project, I don't care if it's for $100 or a high cost project, I first, my first question is, is it necessary? Like, do we need to do it right now, and is it something that puts safety at risk for whether it's for our students or for the people of this town?...in regard to the ballot questions, we have safety issues and we have dripping roofs and other issues. So the ballot questions are a safety issue for our students. And so then come the finances and how we can pay for them."
Ms. Campbell said spending money was always a hard question because everyone brought their own background and way of life to the decisions. She agreed that they have to look at safety. "I've gone to a couple meetings, and I've listened to the projects, and I've looked at the cost, but from what I understand, I would much rather make a decision not today. Thank god, I don't have to do that right now. But I'd like to be informed fully, and I'd like to look at the costs to our town, if we choose it. What happens if we wait and then we don't have that reimbursement or or that safety net, and we have to incur all of that cost with a closed building, or, God forbid someone gets hurt. So I think it's really important to check all of the boxes and to look at all of the scenarios. Money is scary, and nobody wants to be the one up here saying, Yes, we should spend more money. And that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying we have to look at all of the scenarios and do what's best for our town."
Mr. Gaynor said, "The problem with government is that it's not proactive and preventive, but it's rather reactive and responsive, and that's at all levels, the municipal level, your cities and towns and counties, at the state level and at the federal level. Why do we have to wait for a roof to collapse and, God forbid, injure or even kill one of our children. We need to invest in our schools. We need to repair these roofs. You can say, it's going to increase my taxes. But in five years, or 10 years, the roofs are going to have to be repaired anyhow. And you have, right now, 78 percent of $20 million, $13 million, is going to be reimbursed from this from the state. The other $7 million, is that really going to come from the taxpayers? They're going to do municipal bonds financing, right? I myself am voting on all three of the ballot questions because I believe in repairing the schools and making the schools last. So I believe in capital improvement programs and projects I and I think that is fiscal responsibility, transparency and accountability, and ultimately our fiduciary responsibility as a school committee, and as voters in this town."
Ms. Senecal said it's a tough question, and it's hard to put on the backs of voters on top of the $1.9 million override last year. "I am not for this whole project. I think I see certainly merit in doing the Murdock building. I see merit in doing the Memorial School. I do not see the merit in using any money to improve Toy Town. I think that school has passed its life span, and I think that consolidation is the response to that." She added, "We are a poor community, and we have a high percentage of people on fixed income, and so now you're looking at another tax increase on top of the one we already had, and you have a lot of people who are going to say, well, do I take my heart medication today or do I have lunch?" But, she concluded, "It's a tough call, and I think in the ballot box we're each going to have to make that decision for ourselves."
(Audience questions in following article, below!)
Audience Members Question Candidates for Town Board at Candidates' Night Forum

From left, Candidates for School Committee Karen Kast, Alyssa Campbell, Michael Gaynor and Yvonne Senecal, Candidate for Board of Health and Board of Selectmen Barbara Zisk, and candidate for Board of Health Monique Connor
Photo copyright Town of Winchendon
(Continued from article above) Following the prepared questions read by moderator Paul Hackett at Tuesday's Candidates' Night forum in the Winchendon Town Hall 2nd floor auditorum, audience members were invited to come forward to pose their questions directly to the panel of candidates. Audience members were asked to keep their questions brief and be sure to say who the questions were for, if not intended for all of the candidates.
(Participating candidates were: Karen Kast (School Committee), Alyssa Campbell (School Committee), Michael Gaynor (School Committee), Yvonne Senecal (School Committee), Barbara Zisk (Board of Selectmen and Board of Health), and Monique Connor (Board of Health). The forum was livecast and recorded by WinchendonTV and the full video is available to view on WinchendonTV. (https://winchendon.cablecast.tv/internetchannel/show/379?site=1)
The first audience member to come forward was Tina Santos, who asked Barbara Zisk why she was running for two different boards, after running for School Committee in the past. Also, if she was elected to both of the boards she is running for now, which one would she choose to serve on?
Ms. Zisk stated that she had never run for a board before, she was a write-in candidate for School Committee last year, and a mid-term appointee to fill a vacancy on the Board of Health. If she is elected to both seats this year, she will step down from the Board of Health and serve on the Board of Selectmen, she said.
Audience member Renee Eldredge came forward to ask candidates for School Committee if they had taken the required training from the Massachusetts Association of School Committees, and if all current members of the School Committee had taken the training.
Ms. Kast said that the training only needed to be taken once, and did not need to be renewed after that. The Town Clerk keeps a record of all required trainings for town Board members.
Mr. Gaynor said that he had taken the training "proactively" to make sure he knew the duties, roles and responsibilities of School Committee members. He felt that it was important for candidates to take the training before they were elected so they would understand what the position entails.
Ms. Campbell and Ms. Senecal had not taken the training yet but intended to at the soonest opportunity.
Audience member Darlene Rossi came forward to ask the School Committee candidates about the COVID policies that were put in place during the pandemic (March 2020-early 2021) and if they would have done things differently, in hindsight, or would do things differently in a similar future situation.
Ms. Kast said that she had moved to Winchendon in February of 2020 and was elected to the School Committee via a write-in campaign that year. "So I cut my teeth in the Winchendon School Committee during that whole thing," she said. "But all of that was pretty by the State Department of Education, so we didn't have a lot of say in that. There were a few things we had to vote on, masks in the schools. That's really the only thing that we got to make a decision on." She herself was home with COVID during the votes. How each School Committee member voted would be a matter of public record and can be looked up in the minutes, Ms. Kast told Ms. Rossi.
Ms. Campbell said that since she hadn't been on the Committee at that time, she really couldn't give an opinion.
Mr. Gaynor said, "COVID really did have a significant impact on our students. We're seeing the educational gaps now. For example, I teach a reading development phonics class with sixth grade students, 11, 12, years old, and they were the students that were impacted by COVID. They were home right when they should have been in first grade, second grade learning how to read, so I can see the gaps. Now I have students that are borderline illiterate that cannot read at at that age, and it's a travesty. Nonetheless, COVID is real, folks. You can be a COVID denier if you want, but it was just as bad as the 1917 flu pandemic. 3 million Americans died of COVID. 7 million people worldwide died. I myself received eight vaccinations because I have co-morbidities.
"But there had to have been a better way to deal with the COVID pandemic. And I don't think the state or the federal government, for that matter, were really prepared for this. And one thing we did learn from all of this is...our kids need to be in school. They can't be home schooled with a robot or an Android, a computer "Plato" as their educator. They need to be with their peers. They need to be in schools. That's why the social-emotional learning piece is so important. We saw that when students weren't socializing with their peers and learning with their peers, they failed."
Ms. Senecal said, "As a registered nurse, I was working in the emergency room through the height of COVID and I got to tell you, I saw no benefits to masking. The masks that people were forced to wear were ineffective at best and damaging at worst, especially when you're trying to mask children or psychotic patients. And I think there was a whole lot of misinformation and and scaremondering and awful things that went down during COVID, and people did die, but usually they died from the treatment, not necessarily from COVID. I am not a COVID denier. I think that it was a legitimate issue, but...if we had another pandemic, I would look at things differently, because I think that common sense just took a vacation. The six feet was random, the masks were random. None of that was effective by any kind of scientific method...I think that the service that was done to our children during COVID for no good reason is is unmanageable. I can't even express how frustrating that makes me." She would definitely do things differently, she said.
Audience member Tara Teixeira came forward to ask all candidates, "In a perfect world, if you could fix one pressing issue off the bat, what would it be?"
Mr. Gaynor began with, saying that first, they would be able to repair the school roofs, because if we don't do it now when we have a reimbursement for 78 percent of costs, eventually the roofs will cost us even more in taxes when they fail in the near future. "We have to invest in our children. It's so important," he said. Regionalization takes years, and right now we don't have any school district with a slightest interest in regionalizing with Winchendon. "So the pressing issue right now is the schools, to make sure that these buildings are fixed so our kids are safe," he said.
Ms. Senecal said, "In a perfect world, I would want every child to have a loving, supportive family and support...and I think that would solve a lot of out problems in our school system and the world."
Ms Zisk said that in a perfect world, communications would be a lot better--among residents, between residents and the town, people could come to meetings and voice their concerns and have discussions. Also, finances would be handled better, with long-term planning and not dipping into Free Cash and borrowing from Peter to pay Paul.
Ms. Connor said that there would be a better process and procedures in health matters.
Ms. Kast said, "If we were in a perfect world, there would be no perfect thing issues, so there'd be nothing to fix."
Ms. Campbell said a perfect world would fix the educational system to "look at the students and what they are going to encounter in the future, and give them what they need, the tools that they need, meet them where they're at and develop them and then work from there. But basically give the students what they actually need, and not what we think they need."
Audience member Theresa Langdon came forward to ask School Committee candidates about the amounts paid to two different outgoing Superintendents (Thad King and Dr. Gosselin), and how voters showed their lack of trust when they rejected the entire school budget in 2024. "How do you propose to change the dysfunctional way of doing business? What criteria should be used to negotiate future contracts?"
Ms. Senecal said, "I think transparency, again, is, is the key to any kind of effective communication between a system and the people that are paying our way in the town. And I think having things come out of the blue where, well, it happened between closed doors, or this was an executive session. I do understand that that needs to happen, but I think what I'm seeing in the past is people have their contracts and then are let go and then they're going to sue you, because then it would cost the town more money to pay out than it would to just pay the money. It doesn't make a lot of sense." She said that you have to be smart when negotiating contracts and know how to ask the right questions.
Ms. Kast said, "There's a document on our website that explained in detail the $180,000 that was paid out, it's been explained ad nauseum and sent to Theresa. The $60,000, I was not the chair that's up to the chair to explain. I've asked for it to be explained countless times. I believe, I would have to go back and check, but anybody at any time can ask for a copy of any of our administrator's contracts. Those are public documents, but there should always be in any administrators contract, just as there is for teacher contracts, a clause that when they leave, if they are let go for whatever reason, whether it's that they did their contract or did something that was not proper, or if they choose to leave for whatever reason, that they may be bought out for whatever reason, or they may not be bought out, so depending on how the contract is negotiated. Unfortunately, administrators, unlike bargaining units, are actually each individually negotiated, so they have to be through our lawyers and everything else before they come back and are signed." She said that she agreed the second situation "was a travesty."
Ms. Campbell said she wasn't on the board at that time and so can't comment, but she would agree that transparency is important. "I also think making sure that the right people are at the table during those conversations, that the town is covered, that people that know contracts, that those types of people are there at the table with the best interest of the town going forward."
Mr. Gaynor said that $240,000 was a Superintendent's salary, in the middle-range. "If I were on the school committee at that time, I would not have voted to allow Mr. King a $180,000 golden parachute balloon payout. Nor would have I voted to allow Dr. Gosselin the $40,000 payout as well for the $240,000. I would have voted both of those down because to me, and we talk about waste, fraud and abuse, I think that's money that's wasted. So we need to ensure, as Karen said, that our counsel reviews these contracts for administration and does not allow them to have a provision where they can receive a buyout. And furthermore, other administrators, like principals, should not be allowed to run a school to underperforming status, and then what we're stuck with them for three years, because if we do pay them out two years of their salary as well."
To conclude the forum, which by now had run more than 90 minutes, Mr. Hackett asked all the candidates to make a closing statement.
Ms. Kast said, "In 1826 the state legislature created school committees. And since that time, we're responsible for following state laws and federal laws, and you know we're responsible for the students, we're responsible to families and the community. And we have to do all of this within budget constraints and so much more, and we want to do all of that, so we're being pulled in 1000 directions at any given time. And I love what I do for the School Committee. I thrive on it. And I think that you have to love doing it. I put 40 to 60 hours a week into my work on the School Committee. If you're not willing to put that time in and continue your education every single day and keep up with the legislative work, you need to rethink it. It's a passion project for me, and I think you need to love it and remember that the students always come first."
Ms. Campbell said that anyone listening to reach out to her for clarification on anything she had said this evening. "I'm very passionate about Winchendon. I am passionate about the schools and our students and our faculty, and I want to bring my expertise, my school knowledge, to the School Committee, and to help in any way that I can. But I'm never going to answer a question unless I am fully prepared to do so. I'm going to only answer with facts. I'm passionate, but it's got me in trouble before. So it's not because I'm trying to skirt it's because I'm trying to get my ducks in a row and make sure I'm giving a thoughtful and honest answer. So if anybody has questions or is questioning any of my motives, please reach out and ask, because I'm very transparent and probably an over-sharer."
Mr. Gaynor said, "I just want to put out there that there's no incentive or personal interest for me to run for the School Committee. I do this for the residents and for your children, for our children. I myself have a passion for education. I have all my life. I've always felt that my role was to serve the public. I served my country honorably for eight years in the US Army Reserves as a combat medic, but I feel like there has been some mixed messages out there on social media, although social media is an important platform. And for anyone that does have further questions, for me, you can reach out at mikegaynor4wsc@gmail.com. So I feel like I have a lot to offer, a breadth of experience, a wealth of education. And I feel like I can make a tremendous difference in our students' lives. I consider myself a visionary, a leader and a change agent, not just a day to day manager."
Ms. Senecal said, "I mainly want the kids to get the quality education that they deserve. I am concerned about where we've been. I'm concerned about where we're going, and I just want to make sure that we leave no stone unturned in giving their kids a quality education. I think their future is so important...I think that we need to see some improvement, and I am also a change maker, and also from the outside, which I think gives a different perspective."
Ms. Zisk said, "I care about Winchendon. I care about the community. I care about the people. I care about the future that we are headed and what we are building together. I have many people, several times a week, reach out to me and ask me questions. I attend many meetings as they know and they reach out. And some people are not comfortable attending meetings and presenting their questions, so oftentimes they'll reach out to me. Could you bring this question forward for me? I'm a voice for Winchendon. I'm a voice for the community. I'm a voice for you, all of you, the taxpayers, every single one of you, and that's important. Communication is important, and I think transparency is important. And I firmly believe that if anybody has any questions, any thoughts, any suggestions, any ideas, feel free to I'd love to have discussions. If I don't have an answer, I will find the answer. I will reach out to the people that have the answers to help you."
Ms. Connor said, "So with the Board of Health, although we have many state laws and regulations that we have to abide by, I want to be able to have that and be able to make things better. Are there things, as far as healthwise go, that we should be taking care of? Maybe, but we're working on it. Sometimes we're restricted to laws and regulations. So how do we make things better? Communication is another thing. I want communication out there. More more communication. We do have a Facebook page. (https://www.facebook.com/winchendonboh) So I want to be able to post health issues, things that concern us on there to get the word out."
All of the candidates thanked everyone who had attended during their remarks. Mr. Hackett also thanked the candidates and the audience for their participation.
DPW Director Updates BOS on Mabardy Landfill and Ongoing Project
At the Board of Selectmen's meeting on Monday, April 27, Department of Public Works Director Patrick Wood gave the Board a number of updates about various projects around the town, some of which residents had recently been asking about.
"Activities at the Mabardy landfill have picked up again," Mr. Wood said, beginning with a topic that several residents had expressed concern about. "You'll remember that last year, I would say September-ish was when they stopped having full time trucks coming in to bring the COMM-97 materials in. It petered out until probably mid-October, and they shut down for the winter. It's good timing, because winter came in kind of early anyway, and then just recently, within the last couple weeks, they started up operations. I was out there about two weeks ago and took a look at the site to see what it looked like after all the snow was melted. Typical erosion control issues. They're already on top of it. They're installing new silt fence all around the perimeter next week, I think it is.
"I've asked [W.L. French] for an updated schedule, and I can just kind of read off of what I've gotten from an email and paraphrase it a little bit, they are expecting another 10,000 tons of COMM-97 to be imported, and that's going to be used to get their final grades for the landfill. The exact quantity is unknown, and they won't know that until they're able to--they're going to have to dig an anchor trench that ties the capping system into the existing grades, so it won't change too much, but they don't have an exact number because of that yet. He does expect that the trucking to be a little bit more sporadic than it was last year, and definitely lower in traffic volume than in previous years."
W.L. French also will be importing around 200 tons of clean sand as part of the capping system, they told Mr. Wood. "Recently, there was a permit modification request to DEP. The modification addressed some technical specifications to the sand drainage layer under the cap and the final coverage systems that's going to be installed, and also to mitigate the ponding that was near the Allens' property that we saw in previous years. Once that permit modification is approved--and it's with DEP, they've reviewed it and they've issued some technical questions back together, and they'll be working on that--they can begin installing the cap, and their goal is to get the cap installed and finished this fall."
Mr. Wood went on to discuss road paving for this year. "We're going to be doing reclamation and paving on Independence Drive and Welch Road. That should be coming up in mid-May, and then later on, the fall of this year, we'll be paving Baldwinville Road from Hale Street to Town Farm Road reclaimed and paved as well. Later the same fall, we'd like to have them come back and do a mill and fill on Central Street, where we already have those trenches dug for the water main. And then next year, in the fall of 2027, we'll be looking at Baldwinville Road from Town Farm Road to Mill Glen and Alger Road from Route 2 to Hitchcock."
Addressing the question of how the department chooses which roads to pave, Mr. Wood said, "There's a lot of factors that go into it. Road condition, obviously, is the primary driver. We assess the road conditions. We look for cracking, potholes, base failure, drainage issues, and just the overall ride quality of the road. Roads that are deteriorating to a point where maintenance is no longer cost effective, it jumps to the top of the list, but that's so many roads in town, obviously we can't have everything just jump to the top of the list. So the other things that we have to look at is some preventative maintenance. Those that haven't reached that point where they just totally gone, what you can do is you save a lot of money in the future by doing preventative maintenance now. So for instance, Central Street, where I just mentioned doing mill and fill, that road is not horrible, but there's been so much trenching, so much patchwork that in five years, that road may have to be reclaimed, and it will cost us as much money to reclaim that than it will if we just do a mill and fill this year.
"So spending the money up front on a major road like that and increasing the comfortability of the drive is well worth it. There's also traffic and usage. Higher volume roads or roads that have key connections and emergency routes, public facilities are prioritized. Obviously, we do coordinate these projects with other utility projects. We coordinate water, sewer and drainage work. So if we know a road is scheduled for some utility work, we obviously are going to delay the paving until that work is done and we allow the trench to settle. And then finally, of course, budget constraints. So we have, unfortunately, just a number of roads that want to be paved every year, but we have to prioritize them because of our funding. All of the funding that we have for the roads come primarily and solely from Chapter 90 money, and that money, luckily, has been more significant in the past couple years, but we can't rely on that every year."
Mr. Wood said he could talk about the EV charging stations at Grout Park, because those had come up in a previous discussion. "It took a little while to nail down the history behind that, because they did get installed, I want to say 2019 I think is when they got installed. Obviously, most of us weren't in this capacity when they were installed, but I did contact Charge Point Charging Stations, the manufacturers, in the operation of maintenance, and they had said that in 2024 both the charging stations became deactivated. There was no notes about why. I would assume that the warranty and the subscription probably lapsed at that point, and they had only one contact in their system, which was the previous Town Manager. So they probably had reached out a number of times without any success, but since calling them now, I've updated them with my contact. I've also added Bill to the contact...and they will get us an idea of how much it's going to cost to reactivate them and fix one of them, because one of them is kind of damaged and smashed a little bit you've probably noticed."
Board member Audrey Labrie expressed some annoyance that the company couldn't be bothered to look up Winchendon and find the current contact to let the town know about the issues. She also asked if there was information about how much the charging stations were used before they were deactivated. She asked if the public or the town paid for the electricity, and whether stations were even needed when people who bought EVs charged them at home.
Board member Erika Eitland said, "Having EV chargers that are not residential is, I think, a part of an economic development sort of piece, if we want people to come here, do they have a charge to get back home? They may not come here if they don't see any charger within an X amount of radius. But wouldn't it be nice if, hey, we've got this great bike trail, leave your car charging and then come to that point. So I think the numbers definitely matter here. But I also would say that just because we're not serving residents, we have to also think about who are we trying to bring into this community."
After some discussion about the chargers and whether they were practical for the town, and who the company should have contacted, Mr. Wood continued.
"The final update that I have prepared is for Blair Square," he said. "We have been working on this Blair Square design since 2021 and we've been contracted through TEC, the engineering company. Since then, they've gotten us through the 25 percent design, the public hearing, and we are currently under contract with them to get us up through 75 percent design and environmental permitting. The next step that actually would probably even be wrapped up this summer, would be to go forward with the 100 percent design and a P, S and E slash pre-construction bid set. So that's the whole package right there that would probably get us right up through Fiscal Year 2028.
"So we were originally slated for construction in 2029, A few years ago. It's a TIP [Transportation Improvement Program] project and a lot of towns go through it. In our regional planning organization, MRPC [Montachusett Regional Planning Commission], they help organize when these projects are going to go out to bid, when they're going to have the funding for them, they're seeing such a high increase in construction costs that actually all the projects are getting pushed out a year. So they just let us know that we're most likely looking at Fiscal Year 2030 to do the construction. I don't want to slow down the design efforts, because I know historically that there have been a lot of towns that when it's their turn for the construction, they're not 100 percent ready for one reason or another. And if we can stay on top of it, we could probably get slid into 2029. There's no urgency to get this done. But we've been working on it for a while. I think we'd all like to see this one cross the finish line."
Mr. Wood confirmed that the planned design is not a rotary. Ms. LaBrie asked if the designs took into account the change in traffic flow from Front Street being blocked to through traffic by School Square. "They are aware of that," Mr. Wood said. "I don't know when the traffic data was collected that they used to generate the 25 percent design. I'd suspect that whenever that was done, I don't think there would be a significant change in traffic patterns or volume since then, otherwise, engineers probably would have wanted to come back out to do it again and MassDOT does a full review of all the plans. They would have picked up on that and requested that."
Winchendon Candidates Set for 2026 Town Election
Candidates have been confirmed for the 2026 Town Election, which will take place on Monday, May 4. The following Winchendon citizens have stepped up to run for seats on elected town boards:
Melissa Blanchard
Barbara Zisk
School Committee (two open seats)
Alissa Campbell
Michael Gaynor
Karen Kast-McBride
Yvonne Senecal
Monique Connor
Board of Health, 2-year term (one open seat)
Barbara Zisk
Board of Health, 1 year term (one open seat)
Paula Whitaker
Housing Authority
Nancy Romanowski

